Dr. Hamilton, Superintendent of the Walled Lake Schools, has sent out a letter and has contacted the WLEA to say he has been informed that there is a possibility that 20J funds could be restored to our schools!
On February 11th, Governor Granholm presents her School Aid Budget and she has the power to put 20J funds back into the budget. As well, the legislature could act to restore 20J funding. This funding would be worth MILLIONS to our district. Dr. Hamilton, in his letter to Walled Lake School employees, has said that without this funding class sizes will need to be raised to 28 in Kindergarten, 29 in grades 1-2, 31 in grades 3-5, and 33-35 in grades 6 - 12.
Please write or call your legislator AND the governor! Use your cell phones at work and use your home email accounts, please! Here are the addresses you need!
Governor Jennifer Granholm
517-373-3400 Phone 517-335-6863 Fax
to write Gov. Granholm, please go to the Michigan.gov website
Speaker of the House Andy Dillon
Phone: 517-373-0857
Fax: 517-373-5976
E-mail: andydillon@house.mi.gov
Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop
Phone: 517-373-2417
Fax: 517-373-2694
E-mail: senmbishop@senate.michigan.gov
State Senator Nancy Cassis
Phone: 517-373-1758
Fax: 517-373-0938
senncassis@senate.michigan.gov
State Senator Gilda Jacobs
Phone: 517-373-7888
Fax: 517-373- 2983
SenGJacobs@senate.michigan.gov
State Representative Vicki Barnett
Phone: 517-373-1793
Fax: 517-373-8501
vickibarnett@house.mi.gov
State Representative Lisa Brown
Phone: 517-373-1799
Fax: 517-373-8361
lisabrown@house.mi.gov
State Representative Hugh Crawford
Phone: 517-373-0827
Fax: 517-373-5873
hughcrawford@house.mi.gov
State Representative Eileen Kowall
Phone: 517-373-2616
Fax: 517-373-5843
eileenkowall@house.mi.gov
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Monday, January 11, 2010
Online classes - the Flex Schedule
Since September I have been reporting on the E2020 program which was used as the curriculum for summer school in Walled Lake. There have also been classes of E2020 occurring outside of the regular schedule at one high school and during the day in another high school.
WALLED LAKE SCHOOLS is offering the 2 hour per day online classes beginning next year. It is called FLEX TIME SCHEDULE. This is not something the district has to bargain with the unions because it has been allowed by the State Superintendent and the State of Michigan.
What is E2020? E2020 is a company that provides ONLINE LEARNING and sells it to districts. There are many companies that provide this service, but Walled Lake bought licenses to use this company’s programming.
In the meantime, last year the State Superintendent (Mike Flannegan – formerly a superintendent in Farmington) raised the SEAT WAIVER for public schools. This means that school districts can get money for students who are NOT ACTUALLY SITTING IN A WALLED LAKE CLASSROOM WITH A WALLED LAKE TEACHER for up to 2 hours per day. There was also a component of Supt. Flannegan’s plan that allowed school districts to join together to allow students to take their entire day through online classes. Genessee Intermediate Schools and Oakland Schools have joined together and this component of the online learning is available through “Gen-net”, the online learning program for Genessee county schools. Oakland County schools also has joined with “Gen-net”.
Obviously, collecting state money for students who don’t actually need a teacher in front of them saves a school district money because they do not need as many teachers. However, this is an ominous development depending on whether students choose to sign up for these classes.
WALLED LAKE SCHOOLS is offering the 2 hour per day online classes beginning next year. It is called FLEX TIME SCHEDULE. There are over 40 classes students can choose from. This will be available for students in grades 9 through 12; students will sign up for either 1st and 2nd hour online classes and report to school hours 4 through 6, or they will attend school hours 1 through 4 and take online classes hours 5 and 6. They are required to leave the building during their online class time. They will NOT be sitting at a computer in the school building.
There will be .8 FTE or Walled Lake teacher assignment allotted to be Mentors or Teachers of Record for these students. The exact responsibilities of their job and the number of students they may mentor is subject to bargaining and is currently in this process. The WLEA has been told that these mentor teachers will be housed at Central High School. They will, among other things, follow up on all of the students’ progress to be sure they are logging on and completing modules in a timely fashion. The students can come into Central and get help from the mentor teachers if they feel the need, but will then go to their respective high schools for the rest of the day. They might be asked to take benchmark tests.
The school district is not sure how many students will sign up for these classes, but hope that 100 per high school will take advantage of the Flex Schedule.
WALLED LAKE SCHOOLS is offering the 2 hour per day online classes beginning next year. It is called FLEX TIME SCHEDULE. This is not something the district has to bargain with the unions because it has been allowed by the State Superintendent and the State of Michigan.
What is E2020? E2020 is a company that provides ONLINE LEARNING and sells it to districts. There are many companies that provide this service, but Walled Lake bought licenses to use this company’s programming.
In the meantime, last year the State Superintendent (Mike Flannegan – formerly a superintendent in Farmington) raised the SEAT WAIVER for public schools. This means that school districts can get money for students who are NOT ACTUALLY SITTING IN A WALLED LAKE CLASSROOM WITH A WALLED LAKE TEACHER for up to 2 hours per day. There was also a component of Supt. Flannegan’s plan that allowed school districts to join together to allow students to take their entire day through online classes. Genessee Intermediate Schools and Oakland Schools have joined together and this component of the online learning is available through “Gen-net”, the online learning program for Genessee county schools. Oakland County schools also has joined with “Gen-net”.
Obviously, collecting state money for students who don’t actually need a teacher in front of them saves a school district money because they do not need as many teachers. However, this is an ominous development depending on whether students choose to sign up for these classes.
WALLED LAKE SCHOOLS is offering the 2 hour per day online classes beginning next year. It is called FLEX TIME SCHEDULE. There are over 40 classes students can choose from. This will be available for students in grades 9 through 12; students will sign up for either 1st and 2nd hour online classes and report to school hours 4 through 6, or they will attend school hours 1 through 4 and take online classes hours 5 and 6. They are required to leave the building during their online class time. They will NOT be sitting at a computer in the school building.
There will be .8 FTE or Walled Lake teacher assignment allotted to be Mentors or Teachers of Record for these students. The exact responsibilities of their job and the number of students they may mentor is subject to bargaining and is currently in this process. The WLEA has been told that these mentor teachers will be housed at Central High School. They will, among other things, follow up on all of the students’ progress to be sure they are logging on and completing modules in a timely fashion. The students can come into Central and get help from the mentor teachers if they feel the need, but will then go to their respective high schools for the rest of the day. They might be asked to take benchmark tests.
The school district is not sure how many students will sign up for these classes, but hope that 100 per high school will take advantage of the Flex Schedule.
Thursday, January 7, 2010
New Developments for the RTTT Legislation
The following is a link to the MEA's press release regarding new developments in talks with the state superintendent and the governor about details of the RTTT legislation.
http://www.mea.org/press/010610_agreement_reached_for_extension.html
I continue to maintain my stance that I will not sign the Memorandum of Understanding, nor a letter of intent. The MEA leaders continue to bargain with the state's leaders regarding the RTTT legislation and promise new details on Monday.
In the meantime, Walled Lake's Board of Education voted not to sign the Memorandum of Understanding at their Special Board Meeting last night. Schools boards in Brighton, Hartland, and South Lyon took similar action in the last 24 hours.
http://www.mea.org/press/010610_agreement_reached_for_extension.html
I continue to maintain my stance that I will not sign the Memorandum of Understanding, nor a letter of intent. The MEA leaders continue to bargain with the state's leaders regarding the RTTT legislation and promise new details on Monday.
In the meantime, Walled Lake's Board of Education voted not to sign the Memorandum of Understanding at their Special Board Meeting last night. Schools boards in Brighton, Hartland, and South Lyon took similar action in the last 24 hours.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
I Refused to Sign the MOU for the RTTT
In the past month I have written on my blog regarding the Race to the Top legislation, “affectionately” known as RTTT. This legislation was required by the Federal government in order for Michigan to even have the ability to apply for the RTTT funds. As a part of the approval process for Michigan’s application to the Federal government for these funds, the State Superintendent is asking all districts to sign a “MOU”, Memorandum of Understanding. This MOU is to be signed by the major “stakeholders” in a school district, including the superintendent, the school board, and the local bargaining association presidents (in Walled Lake that is me). NOTE: Only 13-15 states will qualify for these funds at the end of the application process.
The Michigan Department of Education is requiring local MOU’s of the RTTT plans to be signed and returned by Thursday, January 7th. However, the legislative plan itself is not even in final form! The MEA president, Iris Salters, has asked for an extension of that deadline until the final plan is available for reading, but at this point the extension has been denied.
As a result, I am being asked to sign Walled Lake’s MOU without seeing the final plan. As you can imagine, signing an open contract without final details being available is not something I can do. I HAVE TOLD OUR SUPERINTENDENT I WILL NOT SIGN THE WALLED LAKE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.
The MEA’s legal counsel sent a 12 page document to local presidents outlining what is in the current version of the RTTT legislation. One of the more ominous inclusions is language requiring a “rigorous, transparent and fair performance evaluation system” for all teachers and school administrators. Shorthand for this new section would be “merit pay”. This new section (1249) requires that an evaluation process be established as a way to measure student growth, and then used to evaluate teacher job performance “using multiple rating categories that take student growth data into account as a significant factor”. These measures could also be used to “inform decisions on ….promotion, retention, and development…..grant tenure…..removing ineffective teachers and administrators.”
There is also language in this legislation that outlines intervention models for failing schools. The legislation gives a “State School Reform/Redesign Officer” a choice of 4 intervention models. Under these models a building principal and at least half of the staff could be replaced; the school could be shut down and restarted under the management of a charter school operation; and, any contractual seniority system or other contractual work rules “that impede the reform process shall NOT apply to the school.” Thus, any bargaining contract for employees can be set aside.
Lu Battaglieri, the Executive Director of the MEA has informed local presidents that their signature ultimately counts for only 10 points out of 100’s of points allotted per application. So, a local president’s refusal to sign, in all likelihood, will not cause a local school district to lose RTTT money. However, I find it important to protect our hard earned bargaining rights and stand up for the notion that I will not sign a document that is not in final form. I hope that the membership will support my decision.
The Michigan Department of Education is requiring local MOU’s of the RTTT plans to be signed and returned by Thursday, January 7th. However, the legislative plan itself is not even in final form! The MEA president, Iris Salters, has asked for an extension of that deadline until the final plan is available for reading, but at this point the extension has been denied.
As a result, I am being asked to sign Walled Lake’s MOU without seeing the final plan. As you can imagine, signing an open contract without final details being available is not something I can do. I HAVE TOLD OUR SUPERINTENDENT I WILL NOT SIGN THE WALLED LAKE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.
The MEA’s legal counsel sent a 12 page document to local presidents outlining what is in the current version of the RTTT legislation. One of the more ominous inclusions is language requiring a “rigorous, transparent and fair performance evaluation system” for all teachers and school administrators. Shorthand for this new section would be “merit pay”. This new section (1249) requires that an evaluation process be established as a way to measure student growth, and then used to evaluate teacher job performance “using multiple rating categories that take student growth data into account as a significant factor”. These measures could also be used to “inform decisions on ….promotion, retention, and development…..grant tenure…..removing ineffective teachers and administrators.”
There is also language in this legislation that outlines intervention models for failing schools. The legislation gives a “State School Reform/Redesign Officer” a choice of 4 intervention models. Under these models a building principal and at least half of the staff could be replaced; the school could be shut down and restarted under the management of a charter school operation; and, any contractual seniority system or other contractual work rules “that impede the reform process shall NOT apply to the school.” Thus, any bargaining contract for employees can be set aside.
Lu Battaglieri, the Executive Director of the MEA has informed local presidents that their signature ultimately counts for only 10 points out of 100’s of points allotted per application. So, a local president’s refusal to sign, in all likelihood, will not cause a local school district to lose RTTT money. However, I find it important to protect our hard earned bargaining rights and stand up for the notion that I will not sign a document that is not in final form. I hope that the membership will support my decision.
Sunday, January 3, 2010
REGARDING The RTTT Legislation- from the MEA
MEA Voice Online -- Dec. 22, 2009
Various school reforms make the cut in 'Race to the Top' legislation
Five-bill package passed by Legislature on Saturday puts Michigan in competitive position for additional federal funds
It took marathon sessions this past weekend, but state legislators passed legislation required for Michigan's entry in the "Race to the Top" (RTTT) competition. Passage of these bills clears the way for Michigan to attempt to win millions in additional education funding from the federal government.
It took hard lobbying by MEA members and staff to turn the various RTTT-related proposals around from their original forms, many of which could have been very detrimental to both students and school employees.
The main points of the five-bill package include:
Allowing student test scores to be used as one factor in teacher evaluations. The evaluation process and what other factors should be taken into account are still a subject of bargaining at the local level. The language to implement this in the School Code was lifted from the federal guidelines for RTTT.
Taking over the state's lowest-performing schools and placing them under a reform officer from the Department of Education. See below for more on this provision and the collective bargaining issues surrounding it.
Expanding alternative certification for teachers to fast-track them into classrooms. MEA worked to ensure that these alternative paths maintained high standards for teachers entering the profession, including requiring a 3.0 GPA for admission into a fast-track program.
Allowing approximately 30 new charter schools to open--subject to greater oversight and accountability. High-quality charters could become Schools of Excellence, in turn allowing a new charter to open in their place. Also on the charter school front, 10 additional Schools of Excellence can be opened in the next five years to be run by high-performing charter operators from across the country. MEA stood by our long-standing position of controlled growth of charters in exchange for greater transparency and accountability.
Opening two cyber schools designed primarily for high school dropouts. Student population would range from 400 to 1,000 students each. MEA helped close significant loopholes in this bill that could have allowed unlimited cyber schools with unlimited enrollment and very little accountability for providing a quality education to the students attending them.
Increasing the mandatory attendance -- or dropout -- age from 16 to 18. This policy will begin with this year's sixth-grade class. While MEA believes this change is a good one, it is only a first step. Districts now need to begin the work of keeping students engaged during these extra two years to ensure all students are successful in making it through to graduation. To assist in this process, greater personalization of the rigorous high school curriculum also passed as part of the package.
There are several components of this package of bills that are supportive of MEA members and their rights. For example, the Legislature passed a "Teacher Bill of Rights" to address the need for adequate classroom supplies and books. If teachers don't have what they need to educate students, they can call a state hotline. If the district doesn't provide the supplies and books, the Department of Education will deduct the expense from the district's state aid payments.
Even though bills had been introduced to change teacher tenure, they did not make it into the final package. The argument that the current School Code adequately addressed the requirements of RTTT won out.
In a major victory in the battle against privatization, legislation now requires a school district to get competitive bids before privatizing school support services. This can prevent situations like Durand where the district accepted concessions from the ESP and then turned around and privatized custodians at the very same meeting.
On the other hand, the most disappointing aspect of the final legislation affects members in so-called 'failing schools.' According to the new bill, a 'failing school' is one whose students fall into the bottom 5 percent of proficiency in math and language arts. Under a state takeover of a "failing school," the appointed school reform officer can impose some contract provisions on employees -- with this assault on collective bargaining rights, educators in these buildings are stripped of their voice in helping students.
MEA and AFT-Michigan worked together to help legislators meet every necessary aspect of RTTT. In a joint statement released Saturday, MEA President Iris K. Salters and AFT-Michigan President David Hecker expressed their displeasure with this provision of the law, which had been fended off in negotiations until its re-insertion in the bills at the last minute.
"The overreaching of the Legislature with regard to the collective bargaining rights of employees in struggling schools taken over by a state school reform officer is simply a step too far--and one not needed for RTTT," they said in the statement.
Thorough analysis of all these bills and their implications will be completed by MEA staff during the holiday break and shared with MEA local leaders to help guide them as Michigan takes the next step in competing for RTTT funds -- State Superintendent Mike Flanagan's submission of a state plan to the U.S. Department of Education. That plan is what will implement the various reforms passed by the Legislature -- understanding how that plan is structured is critical to making decisions about RTTT at the local level. MEA is among several statewide school organizations advising members to wait until more details are available before signing on to any local RTTT plans.
Various school reforms make the cut in 'Race to the Top' legislation
Five-bill package passed by Legislature on Saturday puts Michigan in competitive position for additional federal funds
It took marathon sessions this past weekend, but state legislators passed legislation required for Michigan's entry in the "Race to the Top" (RTTT) competition. Passage of these bills clears the way for Michigan to attempt to win millions in additional education funding from the federal government.
It took hard lobbying by MEA members and staff to turn the various RTTT-related proposals around from their original forms, many of which could have been very detrimental to both students and school employees.
The main points of the five-bill package include:
Allowing student test scores to be used as one factor in teacher evaluations. The evaluation process and what other factors should be taken into account are still a subject of bargaining at the local level. The language to implement this in the School Code was lifted from the federal guidelines for RTTT.
Taking over the state's lowest-performing schools and placing them under a reform officer from the Department of Education. See below for more on this provision and the collective bargaining issues surrounding it.
Expanding alternative certification for teachers to fast-track them into classrooms. MEA worked to ensure that these alternative paths maintained high standards for teachers entering the profession, including requiring a 3.0 GPA for admission into a fast-track program.
Allowing approximately 30 new charter schools to open--subject to greater oversight and accountability. High-quality charters could become Schools of Excellence, in turn allowing a new charter to open in their place. Also on the charter school front, 10 additional Schools of Excellence can be opened in the next five years to be run by high-performing charter operators from across the country. MEA stood by our long-standing position of controlled growth of charters in exchange for greater transparency and accountability.
Opening two cyber schools designed primarily for high school dropouts. Student population would range from 400 to 1,000 students each. MEA helped close significant loopholes in this bill that could have allowed unlimited cyber schools with unlimited enrollment and very little accountability for providing a quality education to the students attending them.
Increasing the mandatory attendance -- or dropout -- age from 16 to 18. This policy will begin with this year's sixth-grade class. While MEA believes this change is a good one, it is only a first step. Districts now need to begin the work of keeping students engaged during these extra two years to ensure all students are successful in making it through to graduation. To assist in this process, greater personalization of the rigorous high school curriculum also passed as part of the package.
There are several components of this package of bills that are supportive of MEA members and their rights. For example, the Legislature passed a "Teacher Bill of Rights" to address the need for adequate classroom supplies and books. If teachers don't have what they need to educate students, they can call a state hotline. If the district doesn't provide the supplies and books, the Department of Education will deduct the expense from the district's state aid payments.
Even though bills had been introduced to change teacher tenure, they did not make it into the final package. The argument that the current School Code adequately addressed the requirements of RTTT won out.
In a major victory in the battle against privatization, legislation now requires a school district to get competitive bids before privatizing school support services. This can prevent situations like Durand where the district accepted concessions from the ESP and then turned around and privatized custodians at the very same meeting.
On the other hand, the most disappointing aspect of the final legislation affects members in so-called 'failing schools.' According to the new bill, a 'failing school' is one whose students fall into the bottom 5 percent of proficiency in math and language arts. Under a state takeover of a "failing school," the appointed school reform officer can impose some contract provisions on employees -- with this assault on collective bargaining rights, educators in these buildings are stripped of their voice in helping students.
MEA and AFT-Michigan worked together to help legislators meet every necessary aspect of RTTT. In a joint statement released Saturday, MEA President Iris K. Salters and AFT-Michigan President David Hecker expressed their displeasure with this provision of the law, which had been fended off in negotiations until its re-insertion in the bills at the last minute.
"The overreaching of the Legislature with regard to the collective bargaining rights of employees in struggling schools taken over by a state school reform officer is simply a step too far--and one not needed for RTTT," they said in the statement.
Thorough analysis of all these bills and their implications will be completed by MEA staff during the holiday break and shared with MEA local leaders to help guide them as Michigan takes the next step in competing for RTTT funds -- State Superintendent Mike Flanagan's submission of a state plan to the U.S. Department of Education. That plan is what will implement the various reforms passed by the Legislature -- understanding how that plan is structured is critical to making decisions about RTTT at the local level. MEA is among several statewide school organizations advising members to wait until more details are available before signing on to any local RTTT plans.
Friday, December 18, 2009
See you next year!
Thank you to all for your hard work this year on the important issues facing our membership. As new issues are emerging at the state and local level, I believe we will all need to arm ourselves with information.
In the meantime, have a wonderful, restful two weeks and see you next year!
Terese
In the meantime, have a wonderful, restful two weeks and see you next year!
Terese
Regarding the Petition "We Need Your Help"
I have learned today that a petition is in existence that is called “We Need Your Help! Walled Lake K-12 Teaching positions are at Stake!”. It further states that, “We now understand that a WLEA vote will not happen in time to save electives and k-12 teaching positions unless WLEA teachers demand a k-12 vote before the first week of February…….”.
I believe it is important for everyone to know that the WLEA must always be sure that a plan is brought forward to the membership after it has been thoroughly explored and that all possible ramifications have been identified. It is to no one’s advantage to rush decisions. The essay included with the petition does not fully reflect all of these issues.
I am particularly concerned that the petition does not reflect what I have said is the process to follow required by our Constitution and Bylaws.
1) A plan can be taken to the Bargaining Committee. The Bargaining Committee can then decide whether to take the plan forward.
******At this point a Letter of Understanding would need to be agreed upon between the WLEA and the administration of the Walled Lake Schools.
2) A Letter of Understanding can then be taken to the WLEA Board of Directors, who can then decide to vote on it themselves, or send it to the General Membership for a vote.
Terese
I believe it is important for everyone to know that the WLEA must always be sure that a plan is brought forward to the membership after it has been thoroughly explored and that all possible ramifications have been identified. It is to no one’s advantage to rush decisions. The essay included with the petition does not fully reflect all of these issues.
I am particularly concerned that the petition does not reflect what I have said is the process to follow required by our Constitution and Bylaws.
1) A plan can be taken to the Bargaining Committee. The Bargaining Committee can then decide whether to take the plan forward.
******At this point a Letter of Understanding would need to be agreed upon between the WLEA and the administration of the Walled Lake Schools.
2) A Letter of Understanding can then be taken to the WLEA Board of Directors, who can then decide to vote on it themselves, or send it to the General Membership for a vote.
Terese
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
